Monday, December 7, 2009

The Irrefutable Result of 40+ Years of Liberal Progressive Governance

Top 10 American Cities With the Highest Poverty Rate by
Rank, City, State, and % People Below Poverty Level

1. Detroit, MI 32.5%
2. Buffalo, NY 29.9%
3. Cincinnati, OH 27.8%
4. Cleveland, OH 27.0%
5. Miami, FL 26.9%
5. St. Louis, MO 26.8%
7. El Paso, TX 26.4%
8. Milwaukee, WI 26.2%
9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1%
10. Newark, NJ 24.2%
U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007

History of City Mayors of those Top 10 Poorest Cities:

Detroit
Since 1962 every mayor of Detroit has been a liberal progressive democrat


Buffalo
Since 1962 every mayor of Buffalo has been a liberal progressive democrat


Cincinnati
Since 1962, there has been only 3 Republican Mayors, but 10 liberal progressive democrat Mayors the last one 30 years ago.


Cleveland
Since 1942, there have been 2 Republican Mayors but 9 liberal progressive democrat Mayors


Miami
Since 1957, there have been 1 Republican and 1 Independent Mayor and 10 liberal progressive democrat Mayors


St Louis
Since 1949 there has been nothing but liberal progressive democrat Mayors in St Louis. 9 to be exact.


El Paso
The last Republican Mayor of El Paso was 1889 Every one since has been a democrat then a liberal progressive democrat


Milwaukee
Since 1960, Milwaukee has had 4 Mayors, all liberal progressive democrat


Philadelphia
Since 1952 Philadelphia has had nothing but liberal progressive democrat mayors, all 9 of them.


Newark
Since 1953, Newark has had nothing but 5 liberal progressive democrat Mayors,




Top 10 States with Highest Poverty Rate,
by
Rank, State, and % People Below Poverty Level

1. Mississippi 21.1%
2. District of Columbia 19.6%
3. Louisiana 19.0%
4. New Mexico 18.5%
5. Arkansas 17.3%
5. West Virginia 17.3%
7. Kentucky 17.0%
7. Oklahoma 17.0%
9. Texas 16.9%
10. Alabama 16.6%
U.S. Census Bureau, Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2006


History of State Governors of those Top 10 States

Mississippi
Since 1876 Mississippi has had 32 Governors. 30 of them have been Democrat.


District of Columbia
OK they are called 'Mayors' but since it is the highest official, it is listed under States and Governors. Feel free to list in the Cities above if you like.
Either way, since 1967 it has been nothing but Democrat Mayors running Wash DC.



Louisiana
Since 1881 there have been 33 Governors with only 4 being Republican the other 29 Democrat.


New Mexico
Since 1925 NM has had 24 Governors only 7 Republicans with 17 Democrats


Arkansas
Since 1836 there have been 62 Governors with only 4 Republicans, 1 Military, and 57 Democrats.


West Virginia
Since 1933 there have been 16 Governors of WV. 4 were Republicans with 12 being Democrats.

Kentucky
Since 1867, Ky has had 38 Governors with only 8 Republican and 30 Democrats.


Oklahoma
Since 1907 OK has had 26 Governors 4 Republicans and 22 Democrats

Texas
Since 1846 (When Texas joined the Union) There have been 50 Governors. Only 6 of which were Republicans and 4 Military after Civil War.

Alabama
Since 1872 there have been 40 Governors, 3 Republicans and 37 Democrats.

Now is it just me that sees a very major commonality between all these American cities, North, South East and East, and the people who run these Top Ten Cities (250,000 or more population) with the Highest Poverty Rate?

And is it just me that sees a major commonality between all these American States, and the people who run these Top Ten States with the Highest Poverty Rate?

I keep hearing about how the 'Liberal Progressive Democrats' are so great at governing and running things, and making 'poor people' richer, while taxing the wealthy.

But the top 10 cities and states who have been run by 'Liberals - Progressives - Democrats' from around 80% to a full 100% of the time all happen to be the ones with the HIGHEST POVERTY RATES.

Now exactly why is it the 'Liberal Progressive Democrats' who seem to be so high on 'social justice' on 'equality' on 'taking from and taxing the rich to give to the poor' all happen to be running these same poorest cities and states most if not 100% the time?

The answer? Progressive Liberal Democrats are using the down trodden and the poor (because they are unable to defend themselves) to gain and maintain power. If you look at the current administration through this 'set of glasses', it all becomes very clear.

No comments:

Post a Comment